미래학교
출판물 EN

[최신 릴리즈] 이곳을 클릭하여 월간 미래학교: 9월호를 확인해 보세요.

Shall we unlearn how to learn? How do we learn together? What do we actually learn from each other? Is there a space to trigger collaborative learning? From what situation do we learn the most? What does project based learning means? And democratic learning? Or supportive pedagogy? Isn't a school a community of interests? How do we share knowledge? What are the tools to learn? Can we base learning on improvisation? Aren’t we all learners? Aren’t we all teachers? How to foster knowledge and know-how sharing? Within a non-exhaustive exploration of learning strategies at stake within Constructlab’s practice, we will within the Biennial collectively take some time - and space - to think and rethink the way we learn and exchange. Program of events to be released soon.

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 09:26 PM

Atelier Collaborative, Hotel Egon ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 07:46 PM

Atelier Collaborative, Hotel Egon ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 07:47 PM

Atelier Collaborative, Osthang Project, Main Hall ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 07:53 PM

Atelier Collaborative, Hotel Egon ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 07:54 PM

Mont Reel, Montreal, 2018 ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:33 PM

Unlearning Center, Switzerland, 2019 ©Constructlab

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 09:02 PM

Superort - Supergau, Austria, 2021 ©Philippe Gerlach

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 09:13 PM

Le cours de l'eau, la cour et l'eau ©Mathilde Gintz

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Le cours de l'eau, la cour et l'eau ©Juul Prinsen

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Learning in Constructlab practice

Presentations from Constructlab members revolving around learnings gathered within projects. What, how and why do we learn ?

28th October 15h-17h
Live from the Future School in Venice

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Learning from other collaborative practices

Conversation with Rosario Talevi and Tiphaine Abenia about non-formal education, collaborative initiatives in and out of academia. What can education institution can learn about collaborative learning practices?

29th Octobre 15h-17h
Live from Future School in Venice
(link available soon)

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

It’s a sunny morning again. It’s luckily always sunny when a project starts. Sunny, but dusty. It is in the middle of a construction site. Participants have just met the day before. Just the time to share a name, a full background in ten words, a reason to be here. Maybe they had time to exchange on their vision, their ambition, before they go into the unknown. They certainly know what experience they want to have. At least, they have an idea of what to expect.

And that is revealed, while they are, on that very first morning, in front of the wall. It’s time to choose. In front of them, a giant table drawn on a wall will become crucial for the rest of the week. Their choice, at that moment will turn them into cooks, carpenters, singers or designers, at least for the next couple of days. The first ones get served, the next ones negotiate.
Soon enough, that choice that was so hard to make—Shall I stay with the new friends I met yesterday or shall I stick to what I wanted before?—will no longer matter. Soon enough, participants understand that there is more than just one decision. The energy is common. All are part of a bigger project—whether it is to build a mountain, a mill, a swimming pool, a city island, a metavilla or an arch—with a bigger ambition than one’s own, and all the pieces gathered here are essential for it to work. There the participants choose their level of engagement: some will choose to only help, others will choose to help and learn—and then maybe help and learn close to somebody else, by doing something else. Nobody needs to feel alone in his/her field. While exchanging, they get the help they want or need. It’s only a couple of days, the task is clear, the goal is known, the engagement voluntary. Even when it is about building six hundred pieces of the same part, it never lasts very long.
Again that time of the choice on the wall. The groups were made. Today, they dissolve again, and mingle another way. So, what this time? Do they choose something they already know? Or do they try something new? As in the Bauhaus preliminary course, the collaborative workshops give a glimpse of it all and a lesson for life. Beyond each discipline —wood working, graphics, video, furniture making, cooking, performing, everything—a master is in charge of the new group. Sometimes a new workshop is made; sometimes a participant becomes a master. Because sometimes, something is missing. The teaching starts again as an exquisite cadaver. One starts to work where somebody else’s work ended. Meanwhile, in the cooking workshop, the one that sustains the group, everything starts afresh everyday.

They come willing to learn a skill and gain experience. In fact, what they learn is intangible. They learn to become part of a group, they learn to negotiate with others, they learn to position themselves in a micro-society, they learn they can do crazy things, together. They learn to exchange and they exchange through experimentation, through making. Sometimes they reenact what they learn by talking to each other, and for that they also have the evenings, the dinners, the nights or the breakfasts. It is practical and theoretical, empirical and poetical. It’s special. Within the strong pedagogical methodology made up of rhythms, disciplines and missions, participants learn to negotiate freedom. There, they do not just experiment through collaborative work. They feel it. They get it. They come back again.

Extract of "How Together", 2019

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 07:55 PM

Constructlab Future Session, Constructlab Meeting, Berlin, 2016

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:04 PM

Constructlab meeting in Cantercel, France 2020

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:06 PM

Constructlab meeting in Cantercel, France 2020

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:35 PM

The doorbell rings every two minutes. Every time, the closest to the door opens it. Every time, the same surprise effect. Sometimes the door opener and the newcomer will meet each other for the first time. By exchanging their names, they hear their respective accent and locate each other on a mental map. Sometimes, the door opener and the newcomer have already shared memories. The encounter turns into loud hugs and laughs. This time of the year is the occasion to gather in one place people usually distant. Within the next few days, everybody will have met everybody. Everybody will discover colorful personalities.
It is comfortable here; all know they have something in common. They are here because they want to be. They are here because they think what they do matters. They are here because they need to share. They are here for enjoyment. They are here to go on. They are curious to know in which direction.

They are all here. Amidst the general happy noise, a voice stands out : “Shall we start?” One by one, people move to the other room, caring to carry the right amount of chairs, pens, drinks while continuing the conversation in movement. The move is so smooth that it seems orchestrated. People simply look, exchange and dare to ask each other for what is missing. Every guest takes spontaneously responsibilities for the group. The seemingly organic meeting transforms slowly into an improvised assembly.
The group aligns itself with half a circle, facing what comes on the white wall or the free surface. The hosts of the session start presenting what they have planned: timeframe, format, questions, ambitions and celebrations. They know they are here to work, but in these conditions, work and fun are almost the same thing. One can feel the untold wishes and the sympathetic critics by discovering the yearly projects of the other members, they wish they were there to share time and work. Together. They see what they would have done differently. They bring the topic further. They compare it to their own actions. It makes them think. They are inspired. Today they discover the whole, that they all contribute to building in parts. They wish they had more time for such projects. Or maybe they wish they had more money for such projects. They wish they could do more, live it and live from it.
“By the way, can I ask something? Who decides who is paid or not? And how are projects distributed among the group?” asks a new member. “How do I know I am a member?” asks another one. Whispers rise from the assembly. One answer consists in explaining how it works. Practically speaking. From there, one can build a proposal. The question is not about who decides, but actually about how the decisions are made. It needs consent. It needs compromise.

If the group decides it is a group decision, then it is. If the group decides there should be a guideline, then there is. There, the group decides that no one decides. The project decides. A project can tell if it has the required qualities, ambitions and processes to become an interesting project for the group. Decision making is a product of design.

Extract of "How Together", 2019

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:09 PM

https://www.constructlab.net/projects/how-together-the-book/

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:19 PM

"We are all improvising. We are all making decisions. And we are all watching each other improvise. Together, we are improvising. Decisions become shared ones. We will have built this city together."

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:23 PM

Atelier Collaborative, July 2021, France

조안느 푸젱 — 2021.5.18 08:40 PM
협업의 아틀리에

협업의 아틀리에

베니스, 온라인, 워크숍

다분야를 아우르는 공동의 배움과 생활을 실험하다

개요

컨스트럭트랩은 며칠에 걸쳐 미래학교 베니스 캠퍼스에서 ‘협업의 아틀리에’를 개최해 여과 없는 피드백, 전략적 기획 및 의견을 나누는 연례 공개 세션을 연다. 이들은특히 건축계 내부 교육 전략에도 초점을 맞추어 20세기초부터 시작된 진보적인 대안적 교육 접근법을 되돌아본다. 헌신적인 참가자들에 의해 건설적이고 유쾌한 열린 회합이 이러한 프레임 안에서 구축될 예정이다.

전시 프로그램 참여자

지금/여기

Creamy Polenta, St Erasmo's artichokes, crunchy sage and Doge honey

카를로타 노벨라 — 쿠치나 세미 아쿠아티카 — 19시간 전

On Saturday 25th September the Cucina Semi Aquatica opened its online doors for a lunch and dinner cooking workshop which focused on introducing productive landscapes, existing between land and water, through the medium of food.
We cooked together via Zoom and the recording of this session will be available soon on Future School website.

On the day, we created three simple dishes - one starter, a main and a dessert - inspired by the Venice island of St Erasmo and the Liverpool and Leeds Canal.

The recipes we explores departed and took inspiration from these two very different landscapes, looking at their history and evolution across time. Although the meal featured ingredients which are very much local to these two sites, we invite everyone to recreate the recipes with the ingredients representing territories between land and water which are more local to them.

On this page you can find a list of ingredients - and guidelines on how to find local equivalents - the full cooking process and a list of utensils you might need if you plan to create the three recipes at home.

To share with us your adapted recipes, you can email carlotta@publicworksgroup.net

Thank you!

카를로타 노벨라 — 쿠치나 세미 아쿠아티카 — 19시간 전

Learning from other collaborative practices

Conversation with Rosario Talevi and Tiphaine Abenia about non-formal education, collaborative initiatives in and out of academia. What can education institution can learn about collaborative learning practices?

29th Octobre 15h-17h
Live from Future School in Venice
(link available soon)

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Learning in Constructlab practice

Presentations from Constructlab members revolving around learnings gathered within projects. What, how and why do we learn ?

28th October 15h-17h
Live from the Future School in Venice

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Le cours de l'eau, la cour et l'eau ©Juul Prinsen

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

Le cours de l'eau, la cour et l'eau ©Mathilde Gintz

조안느 푸젱 — 어제

BIO
Ana Betancour is an architect and Professor of Architecture at the UMA School of Architecture, Umeå University, where she was the Head of School (2015-2019). She was previously a professor in Urban Design at Chalmers University of Technology (2007-2014), and Senior Lecturer at KTH School of Architecture, Stockholm (2001-2007), and The Bartlett, UCL, London (1999-2003). Betancour was the Head of Exhibitions and Public Programme at The Museum of Architecture in Stockholm (2007-2009). She founded the A + URL/ Architecture + Urban Research Laboratory (1999-2007), and she co-founded P.H.A.B. Architects (1996-2001). Together with Carl-Johan Vesterlund, she co-founded the Urban + Architecture Agency in 2008.

BIO
Carl-Johan Vesterlund is an architect and Associate Professor in Architecture, Urban Planning and Design at Umeå School of Architecture (UMA) since 2015. Until 2019, he was a member of the Leadership at UMA, the Director of the Architectural Programmes and Master’s programmes, and responsible for the development of the new Master’s Programme in Architecture and Urban Design. Prevously, Vesterlund was Senior Lecturer at the Chalmers School of Architecture, Chalmers University of Technology (2008-2015) and guest teacher at KTH School of Architecture, Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm (2005-2007). Together with Ana Betancour, he co-founded the Urban + Architecture Agency in 2008.

아나 베탕쿠르 — 글로컬 상상의 지도 — 3일 전

We have in our practice and teaching over many years developed a trajectory of projects investigated how global issues are affecting local conditions. By mapping, analysing and understanding responses and tactics to the global crisis in a local context, we have explored how local ways to operate could catalyse change within global transformations affecting urban and rural areas today.

As an example of this endeavour here we describe a project on the city of Gothenburg.

We have investigated transient edge conditions of harbour cities in relation to climate change, rising water levels, dynamic water conditions, flooding strategies and shifting economies. Studying the dynamics of the flooding in Gothenburg, we have explored the threats and problems the city and its built environment are exposed to, due to rising water levels. We have explored natural water edge ecologies; the logics and dynamics of ecosystems that are dependent on and profit from flooding and fluctuating water levels, imagining the riverbanks as a potential productive edge and water infrastructure system. How could this system be developed to be integrated in and become part of the city, and contribute to ways of living and working, production and recreation?

In our work and investigations of Gothenburg, a city which has undergone major changes during the past decades, have been focusing on developing alternative future scenarios and identities for the city, departing from its relationship to water. From being a significant harbour and industrial city, then turning into a city with an industry in decline, Gothenburg shows a high rate of unemployment, socio-cultural and racial tensions, a shortage of housing, and is one of the most exposed and threatened cities from rising sea levels and flooding in Sweden. The City Planning Office, in collaboration with property developers and the industry, have developed future plans for Centrala Älvstaden – an urban regeneration project for the region and the city of Gothenburg, branding, densifying and changing the structure and character of large areas of the city through 15,000 new dwellings and 40,000 new work opportunities for the north and south river-banks located in high-risk flooding zones.

Departing from the understanding of the coastal edge as a system, a productive industrial edge and an operative infrastructure, we developed propositions for an urban network – a series of interconnected cross-programmed spaces and architectural interventions – where the flooding water could be considered as a resource for the future of Gothenburg. Based on the model of a network, its physical as well as non-physical organisational pattern is an urban planning strategy in which the relationships and connections between actors, programmes, activities and spaces can be understood as both spatial and programmatic. The network is developed as a flexible series of self-sufficient spaces for fluctuating flows and uses, making it adaptable to future challenges and opportunities. Applying a wider and softer notion of infrastructure or infrastructural ecology, this added layer of intensity, enhancing the production, interaction, exchange and sharing of resources and space, could make it less vulnerable and less dependent on high technology and advanced infrastructure. Programming of spaces and architectural interventions, such as floating markets, biogas parks, waste water gardens, algae farms, and osmotic power plants, have been focusing on self-sufficiency in terms of energy and resources, local production and recycling, commonly shared, owned, used and run by local communities. Imagining Gothenburg as a city on water, where the rising water is considered a productive and common asset rather than a threat, we believe is critical for a sustainable development of the city.

아나 베탕쿠르 — 글로컬 상상의 지도 — 3일 전

Urban Networks, aerial view, Gothenburg © U+A Agency with Mathias Holmberg

아나 베탕쿠르 — 글로컬 상상의 지도 — 3일 전

Urban Networks, Gothenburg © U+A Agency

아나 베탕쿠르 — 글로컬 상상의 지도 — 3일 전

전시 프로그램

미래학교